Compliance with judgments and decisions ? the experience of the inter-american court of human rights: a reassessment
| Páginas | 227-242 |
Capítulo VII
COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENTS AND
DECISIONS – THE EXPERIENCE OF THE
INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF
HUMAN RIGHTS: A REASSESSMENT1
Summary: I. Preliminary Observations. II. Referral of Non-Compliance
to the Main Organs of the OAS. III. Supervision of Compliance with
IACtHR Judgments and Decisions. IV. Supervision Motu Propio by the
IACtHR Itself: e Leading Case of Baena Ricardo and Others (270 Workers
versus Panama, 2003). V. A Setback in the Practice of the IACtHR: “Partial
Compliances”. VI. Final Observations.
I. PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS.
1. It is a source of great satisfaction to me to participate in this Seminar of
the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR): it aords me the occasion
to renew the expression of my links of aection with the Tribunal, which go
back to the early seventies. I keep a live and good memory of the two previous
occasions I took the oor herein, namely, in the ceremony of the opening of
the Judicial Year of 2004, under the Presidency of Judge Luzius Wildhaber, and
then in the rst joint meeting of the three international human rights tribunals
(the ECtHR, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights [IACtHR], and the
African Court of Human and Peoples´ Rights) in 2008, under the Presidency
of Judge Jean-Paul Costa. It is a great pleasure to me to come back to the siège
of the ECtHR, now under the Presidency of Judge Dean Spielmann, to partici-
pate in the present Seminar on a subject of great relevance and topicality, – the
Implementation of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, and to
share this panel with Judge Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos.
1 Address delivered by the Author in the Seminar of the opening of the Judicial Year of
2014 of the European Court of Human Rights, held at the Palais des Droits de l´Homme,
in Strasbourg, on 31.01.2014. Originally published in: Implementation of the Judgments of
the European Court of Human Rights: A Shared Judicial Responsibility? – Dialogue between
Judges 2014 / La mise en oeuvre des arrêts de la Cour européenne des droits de l´homme: Une
responsabilité judiciaire partagée? – Dialogue entre juges 2014, Strasbourg, European Court
of Human Rights / Cour europénne des droits de l´homme, 2014, pp. 10-17.
Book-3a.ED-TRIBUNAIS INTERNACIONAIS.indb 227 01/12/18 14:44
Para continuar a ler
PEÇA SUA AVALIAÇÃO