Presupuestos desde el derecho comparado para el perfeccionamiento de la regulación legal de la asimetría municipal en Cuba
| Autor | Orisel Hernández Aguilar - Mónica Álvarez Chávez |
| Páginas | 30-47 |
Por último, a Lei-Quadro acompanha também as ideias de reforma e modernização
administrativas (New Public Management) , com a adopção de modelos de gestão
73
tipicamente privados (v.g. gestão por objectivos, preocupação com a satisfação do cidadão-
utente) como forma de melhorar o desempenho e a qualidade da Administração Pública.
Exemplificativamente, esta empresarialização das entidades reguladoras resulta de
modo claro do dever de utilização de um sistema coerente de indicadores de desempenho, que
reflicta o conjunto das actividades prosseguidas e dos resultados obtidos, englobando
indicadores de eficiência, eficácia e qualidade.74
Vide VASCO MOURA RAMOS, Da compatibilidade do New Public Management com os princípios
73
constitucionais, (dissertação de mestrado defendida na Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Coimbra),
policopiado, Coimbra, 2002.
Cfr. artigo 39º, nºs 1 e 2, da Lei-Quadro.
74
Revista Acadêmica da Faculdade de Direito do Recife, vol.90, n.01, jan.-dez. 2018
30
4
Volume 89, número 01, jan-jun. 2017
Why Individual Freedom and the Autonomy of Law
Stand or Fall Together
Bjarne Melkevik1
Åsbjørn Melkevik2
1 Two Kinds of Autonomy – Legal and Individual
There is, in legal philosophy, an ongoing debate about the autonomy of law, that
is, about the extent to which law is distinguishable from some other phenomena. The
dominant views, today, all understand law as fulfilling a certain instrumental role. Justice
and efficacy, then, are probably the most common relational others to law. For example,
it is common to say that the law should further a certain understanding of distributive
justice – this is the view preferred by philosophers such as John Rawls and Ronald
Dworkin. Others have argued for the efficacy of the law as with the law-and-economics
approach most famously championed by Judges Frank Easterbrook and Richard Posner.
This paper argues for a radically different understanding of the law, as it explains why
the law should indeed be autonomous. The question, however, is not whether the law is
actually autonomous or not – it is obviously not, as the law is too often the plaything of
various lawgivers. The real question is the following – do we want to be autonomous, as
individuals? The answer is obviously yes, individual freedom being a universal value,
and therefore, this paper argues, the law should also be autonomous. There is, as we will
1 Doctorat d’État in Legal Science at University Paris 2 – France. Professor at the Faculté de Droit –
Université Laval /Canada.
2 Ph.D. in political studies, Queen`s University. Post-Doctoral Fellow-in-Residence at Harvard University.
Autores convidados
Recebimento em 27/06/2017
Aceito em 07/07/2017
PRESUPUESTOS DESDE EL DERECHO COMPARADO PARA EL
PERFECCIONAMIENTO DE LA REGULACIÓN LEGAL DE LA ASIMETRÍA
MUNICIPAL EN CUBA
PRINCIPLES FROM COMPARATIVE LAW FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE
LEGAL REGULATION OF MUNICIPAL ASYMMETRY IN CUBA
ORÇAMENTOS DO DIREITO COMPARADO PARA A MELHORIA DA
REGULAMENTAÇÃO LEGAL DA ASSIMETRIA MUNICIPAL EM CUBA
DRA. C. ORISEL HERNÁNDEZ AGUILAR
1
LIC. MÓNICA ÁLVAREZ CHÁVEZ
2
RESUMEN: A pesar de que en Cuba el municipio es responsable de satisfacer las necesidades
mínimas locales, este se encuentra enmarcado en una regulación que homogeniza sus principales
aspectos, lo que provoca que una merma en su funcionalidad que no le permite un desempeño acorde a
la asimetría de las realidades locales. Para dar tratamiento a esta problemática el presente trabajo
ofrece, con base en análisis históricos, doctrinales y comparados, los presupuestos teórico-jurídicos
que deben guiar el perfeccionamiento de la regulación legal de la asimetría municipal en Cuba.
PALABRAS CLAVES: municipio, asimetría municipal, regulación legal
ABSTRACT: While in Cuba, the municipalities are responsible for the local minimum needs, they are
framed in a regulation that homogenize their main aspects, which causes a decline in its functionality
that does not allow a performance according to the asymmetry of the local realities. To give treatment
to this problem this paperwork was proposed, with base in the historical, doctrinal and comparative
analysis, the theoretical-legal presupposition that should guide the improvement of the legal regulation
of the heterogeneity of municipalities in Cuba.
KEY WORDS: municipality, municipal asymmetry, legal regulation
RESUMO: Embora em Cuba o município seja responsável por satisfazer as necessidades mínimas
locais, esta é enquadrada em um regulamento que homogeneiza seus principais aspectos, o que
provoca uma diminuição de sua funcionalidade que não permite uma performance de acordo com a
assimetria de as realidades locais. Para dar tratamento a este problema, o presente trabalho oferece,
com base em análises históricas, doutrinais e comparativas, os pressupostos teórico-jurídicos que
devem orientar a melhoria da regulamentação legal da assimetria municipal em Cuba.
PALAVRAS-CHAVE: município, assimetria municipal, regulamentação legal
Doctora en Ciencias Jurídicas. Profesora de Derecho de la Universidad de Pinar del Río, Cuba.
1
oriselha@upr.edu.cu
Licenciada en Derecho. Consultora jurídica de la Empresa Provincial de Servicios Legales de Pinar del Río.
2
monica.fidel@nauta.cu
Revista Acadêmica da Faculdade de Direito do Recife, vol.90, n.01, jan. - jun. 2018
31
4
Volume 89, número 01, jan-jun. 2017
Why Individual Freedom and the Autonomy of Law
Stand or Fall Together
Bjarne Melkevik1
Åsbjørn Melkevik2
1 Two Kinds of Autonomy – Legal and Individual
There is, in legal philosophy, an ongoing debate about the autonomy of law, that
is, about the extent to which law is distinguishable from some other phenomena. The
dominant views, today, all understand law as fulfilling a certain instrumental role. Justice
and efficacy, then, are probably the most common relational others to law. For example,
it is common to say that the law should further a certain understanding of distributive
justice – this is the view preferred by philosophers such as John Rawls and Ronald
Dworkin. Others have argued for the efficacy of the law as with the law-and-economics
approach most famously championed by Judges Frank Easterbrook and Richard Posner.
This paper argues for a radically different understanding of the law, as it explains why
the law should indeed be autonomous. The question, however, is not whether the law is
actually autonomous or not – it is obviously not, as the law is too often the plaything of
various lawgivers. The real question is the following – do we want to be autonomous, as
individuals? The answer is obviously yes, individual freedom being a universal value,
and therefore, this paper argues, the law should also be autonomous. There is, as we will
1 Doctorat d’État in Legal Science at University Paris 2 – France. Professor at the Faculté de Droit –
Université Laval /Canada.
2 Ph.D. in political studies, Queen`s University. Post-Doctoral Fellow-in-Residence at Harvard University.
Autores convidados
Recebimento em 27/06/2017
Aceito em 07/07/2017
Recebido em 07/12/2017
Aprovado em 23/02/2018
4
Volume 89, número 01, jan-jun. 2017
Why Individual Freedom and the Autonomy of Law
Stand or Fall Together
Bjarne Melkevik1
Åsbjørn Melkevik2
1 Two Kinds of Autonomy – Legal and Individual
There is, in legal philosophy, an ongoing debate about the autonomy of law, that
is, about the extent to which law is distinguishable from some other phenomena. The
dominant views, today, all understand law as fulfilling a certain instrumental role. Justice
and efficacy, then, are probably the most common relational others to law. For example,
it is common to say that the law should further a certain understanding of distributive
justice – this is the view preferred by philosophers such as John Rawls and Ronald
Dworkin. Others have argued for the efficacy of the law as with the law-and-economics
approach most famously championed by Judges Frank Easterbrook and Richard Posner.
This paper argues for a radically different understanding of the law, as it explains why
the law should indeed be autonomous. The question, however, is not whether the law is
actually autonomous or not – it is obviously not, as the law is too often the plaything of
various lawgivers. The real question is the following – do we want to be autonomous, as
individuals? The answer is obviously yes, individual freedom being a universal value,
and therefore, this paper argues, the law should also be autonomous. There is, as we will
1 Doctorat d’État in Legal Science at University Paris 2 – France. Professor at the Faculté de Droit –
Université Laval /Canada.
2 Ph.D. in political studies, Queen`s University. Post-Doctoral Fellow-in-Residence at Harvard University.
Autores convidados
Recebimento em 27/06/2017
Aceito em 07/07/2017
Para continuar a ler
PEÇA SUA AVALIAÇÃO