Problems of knowledge by communication

AutorA.R. Karimov - M.N. Solodukho
CargoKazan Federal University, Russia, e-mail: arrkarimov@kpfu.ru - Kazan National Research Technical University named after A.N. Tupolev - KAI, Russia,e- mail: margarita.nat@yandex.ru
Páginas151-160
Periódico do Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre Gênero e Direito
Centro de Ciências Jurídicas - Universidade Federal da Paraíba
V. 8 - Nº 05 - Ano 2019
ISSN | 2179-7137 | http://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs2/index.php/ged/index
151
PROBLEMS OF KNOWLEDGE BY COMMUNICATION
A.R. Karimov1
M.N. Solodukho2
Abstract: This article deals with the
problems associated with
communicative knowledge. It gives
narrow and broad definitions of
communicative knowledge. The concept
of “evidence” is analyzed. The problem
of the status of communicative
knowledge is analyzed. It is
substantiated that the transfer of
communicative cognition is possible.
The essential and sufficient conditions
for the transfer of communicative
knowledge are determined. As a
sufficient condition for the transfer of
knowledge, it is proposed the following:
for any witness A and recipient B, if 1)
A knows that p, and 2) B is convinced
that p on the basis of the testimony of A,
and 3) that B has no reason to prejudice
the testimony of A , that p, then B knows
that p. 4) The witness and the recipient
have the maximum possible positive
intellectual perfection. The article
criticizes the reductive approach, which
1 Kazan Federal University, Russia, e-mail: arrkarimov@kpfu.ru
2 Kazan National Research Technical University named after A.N. Tupolev - KAI, Russia,e-
mail: margarita.nat@yandex.ru
consists in the fact that any knowledge
obtained by communication from
another is secondary, because in the end
it can be reduced to individual
experience. The article defends non-
reductionism, since it takes into account
the collective nature of cognition. Others
will also learn, and I can learn something
from them.
Keywords: knowledge, communication,
testimony.
Introduction
There are two senses in which one can
talk about the social nature of
knowledge. In the first sense, social
knowledge is the knowledge, which is
not obtained through individual
experience or reflection, but through
communication with others. In the
second sense, the social nature of
knowledge is understood as the
determinism of cognition by social

Para continuar a ler

PEÇA SUA AVALIAÇÃO

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT