Governança de contratos públicos: a materialização dos princípios da eficiência e do planejamento na Lei nº 14.133/2021
| Autor | Vivian Cristina Lima López Valle, João Pedro Teixeira Transmontano, Rodolfo Cancino Gómez |
| Cargo | Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil / ¹Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil / Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico |
| Páginas | 1-36 |
1
https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2023.e96943
Direito autoral e licença de uso: Este artigo está sob uma Licença Creative Commons.
Com essa licença, você pode compartilhar, adaptar, para qualquer fim, desde que atribua
a autoria da obra e forneça um link para a licença, e indicar se foram feitas alterações.
ARTIGO OR IGINAL
e96943
Governance of public contracts: the
materialization of efficiency and
planning principles in law 14,133/2021
Governança de contratos públicos: a materialização dos princípios
da eficiência e do planejamento na Lei nº 14.133/2021
Vivian Cristina Lima López Valle¹
João Pedro Teixeira Transmontano¹
Rodolfo Cancino Gómez ²
¹Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
²Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
A : This a rticle seeks to elucidat e the Governance of public contr acts provided
for in article 11, sole paragraph, of Law 14,133/2021, as the formalization of the
eciency and pla nning princ iples. Thus, it presents the h istorical sea rch for profes-
sionali zation, plann ing and eciency in the Br azilian P ublic Adminis tration, from
the bureaucra tic reform until t he advent of the law 14,133/2021, with emphasi s on
the management reform f rom the 1990s. A fterwards, the subsequent approxim a-
tion of private m anagement mechan isms to public mana gement is presented, with
emphasis on cor porate Governance, wh ich, based on the agency theor ies, resulted
in the concept of the org anizational publ ic Governance, based on the notions of
leadership, strategy and control, widely present in the 2021 law throug h various
instruments. The met hodology used was that of bibl iographic research.
K : Bidd ings. Governance of Publ ic Contract s. Law 14,133/2021. E-
ciency. Planni ng.
R: Este artigo busca elucida r a governança dos contratos públ icos prevista
no artigo 11, parágrafo único, da Lei nº 14.133/2021, como a formalização dos
princípios d a eciência e do planejamento. A ssim, apresenta a busca h istórica pela
prossiona lização, planejamento e e ciência na Admini stração Pública brasileira,
desde a reform a burocrát ica até o advento da Lei nº 14.133/2021, com ênfase na
2 SEQÜÊNCI A (FLORIANÓPOL IS), VOL. , N. ,
GOVERNA NCE OF PUBLIC CO NTRACT S: THE MATERI ALIZAT ION
OF EFFICI ENCY AND PL ANNING PRIN CIPLES IN LA W ,/
reforma ger encial a parti r da década de 1990. Posteriorm ente, apresenta-se a poste -
rior aproxi mação dos mecanismo s de gestão privada à g estão pública, com dest aque
para a governança corporativa, que, com base nas teorias de agência, resultou no
conceito de governança pública orga nizacional, fundamentado nas noções de
liderança , estratégia e controle, a mplamente presentes na lei de 2021 por meio
de diversos instru mentos. A metodologia util izada foi a de pesquisa bibl iográca.
P-: Licitações. Govern ança das Contrat ações Públicas. Lei 14.133/2021.
Eciência. Planejamento.
PROFESSIONALIZATION, PLANNING AND
EFFICIENCY IN PUBLIC ADMINIS TRATION: FROM THE
BUREAUCRATIC REFORM TO LAW ,/
Article 5 of Law Nº 14,133/2021, Law of Biddings and Admi-
nistrative Contracts, contemplating extensivily the principles to be
observed withi n the scope of national public contract s, with emphasis
on eciency and on planning.
The reality is that the search for the professiona lization of Public
Administration through ecient and planned management, despite
not being a new issue on the national scenario, it stil l remains current.
In Brazil , there were three sign icant movements of Administra-
tive Reform throughout the 20th century, aiming at obtain ing greater
eciency in the public sector man agement, namely: the Dasp reform,
in the 1930s, attempting to professionalize public workers in order to
replace the estate man agement model by the bureaucratic; the reform
of the late 1960s, led by Hélio Beltrão, with “de-bureaucratizing”
aspirations, but which, in practice under the military regime, proved
to be statist and centralist; and the reform at the end of the 1990s,
led by Bresser Pereira, which incorporated notions of the managerial
model into Brazilian bureaucracy (N, 2012, p. 225).
Thus, the rst reformist movement in national public manage-
ment took place in the 1930s, during the “Est ado Novo” (New State)
created by Getúl io Vargas, through the Admin istrative Department of
VIVI AN CRIS TINA LIM A LÓPEZ VALLE JOÃO PEDRO TEIXEIRA TRANSMONTANO RODOLFO CANCINO GÓMEZ
SEQÜÊNCI A (FLORIA NÓPOLIS), V OL. , N. , 3
the Public Service (Dasp), created by the Decree-Law Nº 579/1938,
which objective was to rationalize and bring eciency to the public
workers´ production, in consideration of the so-called bureaucratic
management model (N, 2012, p. 22), which emerged as a res-
ponse to the patrimonialist management model1, at the time of the
transition from the Absolutist State to the Liberal one and had as its
main exponent Max Weber.
Christian Mendez Alcantara (2009, p. 26) claries that the We-
berian concept of bureaucracy is related to rationality regarding state
action, through competencies duly provided by laws or regulations,
division of public workers into hierarchies and careers, guarantee
to lifetime tenure for all public employees, specialized training and
workload distribution2. Due to this, Irene Nohara (2012, p. 28) hi-
ghlights that bureaucratic rationality contemplates, par excellence,
the adequacy of means in search of maximizing eciency in solving
social problems.
Therefore, the Weberian bureaucracy proposed the att ribution of
formal rules which aimed at g reater eciency and professionalization
1
On the topic, Lui z Carlos Bre sser Pereira clari es that the “ Bureaucra tic public
admin istration was adopt ed to replace pa trimon ialistic adm inistration, wh ich dened
absolute mona rchies, in which publ ic and private propr iety were confus ed. In this ty pe
of admi nistration, the S tate was understo od as the property of t he king. Nepotism a nd
employabil ity, if not corrupt ion, were the norm. Th is type of adm inistra tion proves to be
incompatib le with industr ial capital ism and parli amentary d emocracies, whi ch emerged
in the 19th centu ry. A clear separa tion between the Sta te and the private se ctor is essenti al
for capital ism; Democ racy ca n only exi st when civi l society, compr ised of cit izens,
disti nguishes itse lf from the State wh ile controll ing it. It therefore beca me necessary t o
develop a typ e of admini stration that st arted not onl y from the clear di stinction bet ween
public and pr ivate, but al so from the sep aration be tween the pol itical a nd the public
admin istrator. Thus, the mo dern rational-le gal bureaucratic a dministra tion emerges”.
(1996, p. 10). The patrimon ial public manag ement model prevailed in B razil until t he
1930s, when the bu reaucratic reform occ urred.
2 With in these l ines are the lessons of Ma x Weber: “Among the fac tors of unden iable
import ance are the rationa l structures o f laws and of the admi nistration, si nce modern
rationa l capitalism no t only needs the tech nical mean s of production, but al so a calculable
legal sy stem and of administrat ion based on formal ru les (WEBER, 2 009, p. 31).
Para continuar a ler
PEÇA SUA AVALIAÇÃO