Restrictions on fundamental rights: an interpretation in the light of Friedrich Müller´s structural theory of law

AutorDébora Dossiatti de Lima - Nestor Castilho Gomes
Páginas1992-2001
1992 • XXVI World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy
Restrictions on fundamental rights:
An interpretation in the light of Friedrich
Müller´s structural theory of law
DéboraDossiaideLima
Nestor Castilho Gomes
Abstract: This article aims to analyze the possibility of restrictions to funda-
mental rights. Firstly, it is important to clarify that, from the theoretical view-
point, the very validity of the idea of restrictions to fundamental rights is con-
troversial, for it depends on a certain conception of legal norm. One theory of
the norm founded on the distinction between rules and principles, as the one
formulated by Robert Alexy, eventually leads to the acceptance of restrictness of
fundamental rights. On the other end, one norm theory that refutes principiol-
ogyasthe onedevelopedby FriedrichMüllernecessarily impliesaneort to
denethematerialextensionoffundamentalrightandnotitsrestriction
Keywords: fundamental rights, Friedrich Muller´s structural theory of law.
The restrictness of fundamental rights depends on a concep-
tion of norm that sees the fundamental rights as denite or prima facie
positions. It is in the scope of norm theory that stands the controversy
aroundthescopeof protectionThedenitionofscopeofprotectionof
fundamental rights has a direct relation with the concept of restriction or
determination of the contents of fundamental rights. These two variations
are translated when overlapping “wide scope of protection vs. restricted
scope of protection”. While Alexy supports the wide scope of protection,
which relates to that which the norm of fundamental right guarantees
prima facie, that is, without taking into account the possible restrictions,
Müller defends that the interpretation of norm programand thedeni-
tion of norm scopewouldsuceinordertodeneatthesametimethe
contents and the limits of each fundamental right in each concrete case.
The questions that arise here are not purely theoretical, void of
anypracticalrepercussionThenormtheoryinuencestheformofap-
plication of fundamental rights: subsumption, Abwägung, embodiment,

Para continuar a ler

PEÇA SUA AVALIAÇÃO

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT