Forensic Examination of Electronic Documents
Autor | Viktor Sezonov, Mykhailo Fialka, Eduard Poltavski, Nataliia Prokopenko, Maryna Fomenko |
Cargo | PhD in Law, Senior Forensic Expert at the Department of Automotive Research and Forensic Research of Vehicles, Kharkiv Research Forensic Center of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Kharkiv, Ukraine/PhD in Law, Associate Professor at the Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Kharkiv, Ukraine... |
Páginas | 81-93 |
Forensic Examination of Electronic Documents (p. 81-93) 81
SEZONOV, V. S., FIA LKA, M. I., POLTAVSKI, E. M., PROKOPENKO, N. M., FOMENKO , M.
V. Forensic examination of electronic documents.
The Law, State and Telecommu nications Review
,
v. 14, no. 2, p. 81-93, October 2022.
Forensic Examination of Electronic Documents
Submitted
: 30 November 2021
Viktor S. Sezonov
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2580-2953
Mykhailo I. Fialka**
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5599-3335
Eduard M. Poltavski***
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7434-7061
Nataliia M. Prokopenko****
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4985-937X
Maryna V. Fomenko*****
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6606-5769
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26512/lstr.v14i2.40965
Revised
:
13 January 2 022
Accepted
: 24 January 2022
Article
submit ted
to
peer
blind
review
License d
under
a
Creative
Commo ns
Attribut ion
4.0
International
Abstract
[Purpose]
The purpose of the study is to reveal the c oncept and essence of forensic
prevention of cr imes of forgery of electronic documents, to identify proble ms in the use of
information to establish a system of cou ntering crime and docume nt management.
[Methodology]
The follo wing approaches wer e used in the wo rk: system-structura l,
dialectical, empirical. Forgery of electro nic documents and their use is investigated n ot
only within the framework of a single criminal case bu t also by a set of cr imes committed
depending on the mechanism that is the main one in the struc ture of crimin al technologies.
[Findings]
Lack of s kills and knowledge ab out the latest forms of documents, methods o f
their for gery and u se in the field of forensic investig ations determine the reasons for the
developmen t of th is condition. The ana lysis of investigative an d judicial practice shows
that cases of forger y of electronic documents are m oved to separate proceeding s due to the
inability to fix the person who c ommitted the c rime. In some cases, court procedures a re
returned f or additional investigation, since investigators ca nnot establish m echanisms for
falsification to ols and bring appropriate c harges.
[Practical Im plications]
The prac tical significance lies in the fo rmation of prop osals for
improving or ma king changes to the legisla tion, effectively improving the activities of law
enforcement a gencies involved in counter ing or combating the for gery of documents.
Viktor S. Sezonov is a PhD in Law, Senior Forensic Expert at the Department
of Automotive Research and Forensic Research of Vehicles, Kharkiv Research
Forensic Center of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Kharkiv, Ukraine. E-mail:
v.sezonov7514-1@kpi.com.de.
** Mykhailo I. Fialka is a PhD in Law, Associate Pro fessor at the Department of
Criminal Law and Criminology, Kharkiv National University of In ternal Affairs,
Kharkiv, Ukraine.
*** Eduard M. Poltavski is a PhD in Law, Deputy Head of the Department of Social
and Humanitarian Disciplines, National Academy o f the National Guard of
Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
**** Nataliia M. Prokopen ko is a PhD in Law, Senior Lecturer at the Department
of Criminal Law and Criminology (Faculty No. 6), Khar kiv National University
of Internal Affairs, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
***** Maryna V. Fomenko is a Senior Lecturer at the Department of Criminal Law
and Criminology, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Kharkiv,
Ukraine.
Para continuar a ler
PEÇA SUA AVALIAÇÃO